 
    
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Jetpack Site Stats can be Misleading	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/</link>
	<description>Practical Information Without The Bloat</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:29:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: admin		</title>
		<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/#comment-222</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://complete-concrete-concise.com/wordpress-2/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading#comment-222</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/#comment-221&quot;&gt;Alan&lt;/a&gt;.

As mentioned, the difference may be down to the time zone of your WordPress site and the time zone Analytics is using.
Alternatively, it might be that Google doesn&#039;t count certain visitors (like robots or spiders crawling your site or bots trying to leave SPAM comments).
Yeah, in the Internet world, realtime has a somewhat different meaning from expected usage.
I take the numbers with a grain of salt. I use it to gauge if the number of visitors is growing, stagnant or diminishing and working out the relative popularity of one article vs another.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/#comment-221">Alan</a>.</p>
<p>As mentioned, the difference may be down to the time zone of your WordPress site and the time zone Analytics is using.<br />
Alternatively, it might be that Google doesn&#8217;t count certain visitors (like robots or spiders crawling your site or bots trying to leave SPAM comments).<br />
Yeah, in the Internet world, realtime has a somewhat different meaning from expected usage.<br />
I take the numbers with a grain of salt. I use it to gauge if the number of visitors is growing, stagnant or diminishing and working out the relative popularity of one article vs another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan		</title>
		<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/#comment-221</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://complete-concrete-concise.com/wordpress-2/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading#comment-221</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the quick reply. I still don&#039;t understand why the Wordpress page views are higher than Google but it may be like the Tootsie pop question, the world may never know.
I guess I&#039;ll follow the Google stats more closely since it gives so much more information.
I did learn something else. I happened to have the realtime trend up and it took 12 minutes from the time you viewed my wife&#039;s site before it showed up in the standard reporting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the quick reply. I still don&#8217;t understand why the WordPress page views are higher than Google but it may be like the Tootsie pop question, the world may never know.<br />
I guess I&#8217;ll follow the Google stats more closely since it gives so much more information.<br />
I did learn something else. I happened to have the realtime trend up and it took 12 minutes from the time you viewed my wife&#8217;s site before it showed up in the standard reporting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: admin		</title>
		<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/#comment-220</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://complete-concrete-concise.com/wordpress-2/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading#comment-220</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/#comment-219&quot;&gt;Alan&lt;/a&gt;.

Correct, Site Stats gives the number of page impressions - which will be higher than the number of visitors. Analytics reports the number of visitors. However, Analytics can also report the number of page views.
Go to &lt;u&gt;Audience -&gt; Behavior -&gt; New vs Returning&lt;/u&gt;&quot; above the graph you will see the number of visits and the number of pages per visit (in my case it is about 1.25).
Go to &lt;u&gt;Content -&gt; Site Content -&gt; Pages&lt;/u&gt; and above the graph you will see: (1) total page views, (2) unique page views (some people might come back for a second or third look at a page).
The difference between the numbers is gets even more complicated if the Analytics and your WordPress times zones are different. For example: in my case, it seems that Adsense is using Pacific Time and Analytics is using Eastern Standard Time. I have my site&#039;s times set to Pacific Time so it more closely corresponds with Adsense statistics.
In general, both graphs should look reasonably similar - I don&#039;t worry too much about the numbers.
Thanks for your comment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/#comment-219">Alan</a>.</p>
<p>Correct, Site Stats gives the number of page impressions &#8211; which will be higher than the number of visitors. Analytics reports the number of visitors. However, Analytics can also report the number of page views.<br />
Go to <u>Audience -> Behavior -> New vs Returning</u>&#8221; above the graph you will see the number of visits and the number of pages per visit (in my case it is about 1.25).<br />
Go to <u>Content -> Site Content -> Pages</u> and above the graph you will see: (1) total page views, (2) unique page views (some people might come back for a second or third look at a page).<br />
The difference between the numbers is gets even more complicated if the Analytics and your WordPress times zones are different. For example: in my case, it seems that Adsense is using Pacific Time and Analytics is using Eastern Standard Time. I have my site&#8217;s times set to Pacific Time so it more closely corresponds with Adsense statistics.<br />
In general, both graphs should look reasonably similar &#8211; I don&#8217;t worry too much about the numbers.<br />
Thanks for your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan		</title>
		<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/#comment-219</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://complete-concrete-concise.com/wordpress-2/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading#comment-219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I enabled the jetpack stats about 2 weeks ago and then Google Analytics about 2 days ago. There seems to be quite a difference in them. In regards to the number of views that jetpack displays, I&#039;m guessing that&#039;s not unique users but instead how many different pageviews have taken place on your site. If someone comes in on the homepage, reads a blog post, back to home, reads another post is that 4 views?
Either way I guess Google is the better of the 2 but even in total pageviews, jetpack seems to be about 20% higher. Which one should I believe?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enabled the jetpack stats about 2 weeks ago and then Google Analytics about 2 days ago. There seems to be quite a difference in them. In regards to the number of views that jetpack displays, I&#8217;m guessing that&#8217;s not unique users but instead how many different pageviews have taken place on your site. If someone comes in on the homepage, reads a blog post, back to home, reads another post is that 4 views?<br />
Either way I guess Google is the better of the 2 but even in total pageviews, jetpack seems to be about 20% higher. Which one should I believe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: admin		</title>
		<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/#comment-218</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 22:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://complete-concrete-concise.com/wordpress-2/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading#comment-218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/#comment-217&quot;&gt;Brad&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for that reply. You&#039;re right, there is an option box to &quot;count registered users&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/#comment-217">Brad</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for that reply. You&#8217;re right, there is an option box to &#8220;count registered users&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brad		</title>
		<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/#comment-217</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 16:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://complete-concrete-concise.com/wordpress-2/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading#comment-217</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just read this article. Good Post. Read the comments, and I just found out, in the JetPack Config, that if the &quot;Count the page views of registered users who are logged in&quot; box is check, then YES it will count your views too because your &quot;Admin&quot; and your a logged in User.
Just for future help.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read this article. Good Post. Read the comments, and I just found out, in the JetPack Config, that if the &#8220;Count the page views of registered users who are logged in&#8221; box is check, then YES it will count your views too because your &#8220;Admin&#8221; and your a logged in User.<br />
Just for future help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: admin		</title>
		<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/#comment-216</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 19:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://complete-concrete-concise.com/wordpress-2/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading#comment-216</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/#comment-215&quot;&gt;Steve&lt;/a&gt;.

Interesting. I wonder why that is?
Maybe I&#039;ll investigate it further when I come back from holidays.
It seems obvious they are not using a cookie to track users. Maybe if you are running your browser in &quot;private&quot; mode, it fools Jetpack into seeing other browser sessions as not belonging to you.
I use Analytics as well, but Jetpack is nice to get a quick overview of what&#039;s happening without having to log into Analytics.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/#comment-215">Steve</a>.</p>
<p>Interesting. I wonder why that is?<br />
Maybe I&#8217;ll investigate it further when I come back from holidays.<br />
It seems obvious they are not using a cookie to track users. Maybe if you are running your browser in &#8220;private&#8221; mode, it fools Jetpack into seeing other browser sessions as not belonging to you.<br />
I use Analytics as well, but Jetpack is nice to get a quick overview of what&#8217;s happening without having to log into Analytics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve		</title>
		<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading/#comment-215</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://complete-concrete-concise.com/wordpress-2/jetpack-site-stats-can-be-misleading#comment-215</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My stats show my own visits even though I&#039;m always logged in (has since I moved to self-host w/ wordpress.org) For a short time this morning it was suddenly filtering out my own visits. I thought maybe something had been updated. But now it&#039;s back to counting them again. (Ie, first thing this morning stats showed my visits+real visits, then the total number went down by 20 and &quot;wordpress dashboard&quot; no longer showed as a referrer, and now my visits and the referrer are back.)
Not a big issue, since I use Google Analytics as well, but the WP/Jetpack graph would be handy to quickly tell current visits.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My stats show my own visits even though I&#8217;m always logged in (has since I moved to self-host w/ wordpress.org) For a short time this morning it was suddenly filtering out my own visits. I thought maybe something had been updated. But now it&#8217;s back to counting them again. (Ie, first thing this morning stats showed my visits+real visits, then the total number went down by 20 and &#8220;wordpress dashboard&#8221; no longer showed as a referrer, and now my visits and the referrer are back.)<br />
Not a big issue, since I use Google Analytics as well, but the WP/Jetpack graph would be handy to quickly tell current visits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
