 
    
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>law of sines Archives - Complete, Concrete, Concise</title>
	<atom:link href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/tag/law-of-sines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/tag/law-of-sines/</link>
	<description>Practical Information Without The Bloat</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2023 12:22:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Proving the Law of Sines</title>
		<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/mathematics/proving-the-law-of-sines/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richardsplanet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 16:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law of sines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sine]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://complete-concrete-concise.com/?p=2748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>If you understand the definition of sine, it is pretty easy to prove the "Law of Sines".</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/mathematics/proving-the-law-of-sines/">Proving the Law of Sines</a> appeared first on <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com">Complete, Concrete, Concise</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="c1">A tutorial on the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Law of Sines</span> can be found <a href="//complete-concrete-concise.com/mathematics/understanding-the-law-of-sines">here</a>.<br />
Assumes an understanding of the trigonometric function <code>sine</code>. A basic tutorial can be found <a href="//complete-concrete-concise.com/mathematics/understanding-sine-cosine-and-tangent">here</a> and a tutorial using the Unit Circle can be found <a href="//complete-concrete-concise.com/mathematics/understanding-trigonomtric-functions-using-the-unit-circle-advanced">here</a>.</div>
<p>The <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Law of Sines</span> says that <em>&#8220;given any triangle (not just a right angle triangle): if you divide the <code>sine</code> of any angle, by the length of the side opposite that angle, the result is the same regardless of which angle you choose&#8221;</em>.<br />
<img decoding="async" class="centered" src="http://i1.wp.com/complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/understanding-sine-law-1.png?w=586" alt="" border="0" data-recalc-dims="1" /></p>
<div class="c1">The actual value (the result of the calculation) is equal to the diameter of the smallest circle you can draw around the triangle that has all three points of the triangle touching the edge of the circle (a circumscribed circle).<br />
We could state the Law of Sines more formally as: <span class="i1">for any triangle, the ratio of the length of a side to the <code>sine</code> of the angle opposite that side is the same for all three sides and is equal to the diameter of the circle which circumscribes the triangle.</span></div>
<p>To prove the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Law of Sines</span>, we need to consider 3 cases:</p>
<ol>
<li>acute triangles (triangles where all the angles are less than 90°)</li>
<li>obtuse triangles (triangles which have an angle greater than 90°)</li>
<li>right angle triangles (which have a 90° angle)</li>
</ol>
<h1>Acute Triangles</h1>
<p><img decoding="async" class="centered" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/proving-law-of-sines-1.png" alt="" border="0" /><br />
With an acute triangle, we draw a line perpendicular from one corner (vertex) to the side opposite the corner:<br />
<img decoding="async" class="centered" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/proving-law-of-sines-2.png" alt="" border="0" /><br />
This splits the triangle into two right angle triangles because the perpendicular line forms two 90° angles (one in each new triangle).<br />
Considering the triangle on the left (the pink one), and using the fundamental definition of <code>sine</code> we write:</p>
<pre><code>         x
sin(<em>b</em>) = —
         A</code></pre>
<p>Considering the triangle on the right (the green one), and using the fundamental definition of <code>sine</code> we write:</p>
<pre><code>         x
sin(<em>a</em>) = —
         B</code></pre>
<p>Since <code>x</code> is the unknown term, we rearrange the expressions in terms of <code>x</code>:</p>
<pre><code>x = Asin(<em>b</em>)</code></pre>
<p>and</p>
<pre><code>x = Bsin(<em>a</em>)</code></pre>
<p>We also write the following true (and seemingly silly) expression:</p>
<pre><code>x = x</code></pre>
<p>We can replace each <code>x</code> with something equivalent to <code>x</code>:</p>
<pre><code>x = x  <strong>→</strong>  Asin(<em>b</em>) = x  <strong>→</strong>  Asin(<em>b</em>) = Bsin(<em>a</em>)</code></pre>
<p>We can rearrange these by cross multiplying to get:</p>
<pre><code>  A        B
—————— = ——————
sin(<em>a</em>)   sin(<em>b</em>)</code></pre>
<p>This looks a lot like the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Law of Sines</span>, but it is not complete, we still need to show that the ratio <code>C / sin(<em>c</em>)</code> is the same as those two.<br />
To do that, we again divide the original triangle into two right angle triangles by drawing a perpendicular line from a different corner to the side opposite that corner:<br />
<img decoding="async" class="centered" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/proving-law-of-sines-3.png" alt="" border="0" /><br />
Using exactly the same steps as above, we get:</p>
<pre><code>  A        C
—————— = ——————
sin(<em>a</em>)   sin(<em>c</em>)</code></pre>
<div class="c1">If you drew your line from corner <code>a</code>, then you will get B / sin(<em>b</em>) instead of A / sin(<em>a</em>).</div>
<p>We now have two sets of equivalencies, but we know that <code>A / sin(<em>a</em>)</code> must be the same in both equivalencies, therefore we can combine both equivalencies and write:</p>
<pre><code>  A        B        C
—————— = —————— = ——————
sin(<em>a</em>)   sin(<em>b</em>)   sin(<em>c</em>)</code></pre>
<h1>Obtuse Triangles</h1>
<p><img decoding="async" class="centered" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/proving-law-of-sines-4.png" alt="" border="0" /><br />
As with the acute triangle, we divide the triangle into two right angle triangles by drawing a perpendicular line from one corner to the side opposite the corner.</p>
<div class="c1">Unlike the acute triangle, there is only one such division you can make. In the case of the image above, it is not possible to draw a perpendicular line from either corner <code>a</code> or corner <code>b</code>.</div>
<p>We solve the problem of the two right angle triangles exactly as we did above and get the same result:<br />
<img decoding="async" class="centered" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/proving-law-of-sines-5.png" alt="" border="0" /></p>
<pre><code>  A        B
—————— = ——————
sin(<em>a</em>)   sin(<em>b</em>)</code></pre>
<p>Because it is not possible to draw another perpendicular line from another corner, we have to use a different technique.<br />
We draw a perpendicular line from one of the other corners to where the opposite side would be if it had continued:<br />
<img decoding="async" class="centered" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/proving-law-of-sines-6.png" alt="" border="0" /><br />
This gives us a right angle triangle for which we can write <code>sine</code>, from its fundamental definition, as:</p>
<pre><code>         x
sin(<em>a</em>) = —
         C</code></pre>
<p>We also have another right angle triangle containing the angle <code>c'</code>, a hypotenuse <code>A</code> and an opposite side <code>x</code>, for which we can write <code>sine</code> as:</p>
<pre><code>          x
sin(<em>c'</em>) = —
          A</code></pre>
<p>The only problem is that <code>c'</code> is not <code>c</code>. However, <code>sin(<em>c'</em>) = sin(<em>c</em>)</code>, so we can substitute <code>sin(<em>c</em>)</code> for <code>sin(<em>c'</em>)</code>.</p>
<div class="c1">This looks like one of those &#8220;I pulled this out of thin air&#8221; statements that we often encounter in mathematics. It&#8217;s not really.<br />
Looking at the image, it should be obvious that:</p>
<pre><code>c' + c = 180°</code></pre>
<p>because line segment B and its dashed extension are a straight line &#8211; in other words, 180°<br />
Two angles which add up to 180° are called <span style="text-decoration: underline;">supplementary angles</span>.<br />
If you look at the trigonometric <a href="//complete-concrete-concise.com/mathematics/understanding-trigonomtric-functions-using-the-unit-circle-advanced">tutorial</a> using the Unit Circle, you will see that angles are measured in a counterclockwise direction from the x-axis. When calculating trigonometric functions for angles greater than 90°, we notice that we can draw an equivalent right angle triangle, but it is flipped (i.e. oriented differently from the &#8220;standard&#8221; right angle triangle).<br />
There are many supplementary identities, some of which are (for angles less than 90°):</p>
<pre><code>sin(α) =  sin(180° - α)
cos(α) = -cos(180° - α)
tan(α) = -tan(180° - α)</code></pre>
<p>or, if you are using radians:</p>
<pre><code>sin(α) =  sin(π - α)
cos(α) = -cos(π - α)
tan(α) = -tan(π - α) </code></pre>
<p>An identity is simply two mathematical expressions that are the same or equivalent.</p>
</div>
<p>Because of the property of <span style="text-decoration: underline;">supplementary angles</span> we can replace <code>sin(c')</code> with <code>sin(c)</code>, thus giving us:</p>
<pre><code>         x
sin(c) = —
         A</code></pre>
<p>As before, we rearrange the expressions in terms of <code>x</code> and get:</p>
<pre><code>x = Asin(c)</code></pre>
<p>and</p>
<pre><code>x = Csin(a)</code></pre>
<p>Just as we did with the acute triangle bove, we can rearrange and equate the two expressions to get:</p>
<pre><code>  A        C
—————— = ——————
sin(<em>a</em>)   sin(<em>c</em>)</code></pre>
<p>Just as for the acute triangle above we have two sets of equivalencies, but we know that <code>A / sin(<em>a</em>)</code> must be the same in both equivalencies, therefore we can combine both equivalencies and write:</p>
<pre><code>  A        B        C
—————— = —————— = ——————
sin(<em>a</em>)   sin(<em>b</em>)   sin(<em>c</em>)</code></pre>
<h1>Right Angle Triangles</h1>
<p><img decoding="async" class="centered" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/proving-law-of-sines-7.png" alt="" border="0" /><br />
In the previous proofs, we managed to create two right angle triangles for comparison and showed that the ratios of the <code>sine</code> to the length of the opposite side were always the same. It is not possible to do this with a right angle triangle, but we can use the definition of <code>sine</code> to solve it.<br />
From the definition of sine we know that:</p>
<pre><code>         length of the side opposite the angle
sin(<em>α</em>) = —————————————————————————————————————
              length of the hypotenuse</code></pre>
<p>For angle <code>a</code> this is:</p>
<pre><code>         A
sin(<em>a</em>) = —
         C</code></pre>
<p>and for angle <code>b</code> this is:</p>
<pre><code>         B
sin(<em>b</em>) = —
         C</code></pre>
<p>As in the earlier proofs, we can rearrange the expressions (in this case, in terms of C):</p>
<pre><code>      A
C = ——————
    sin(<em>a</em>)</code></pre>
<p>and</p>
<pre><code>      B
C = ——————
    sin(<em>b</em>)</code></pre>
<p>As before, we write the obvious:</p>
<pre><code>C = C</code></pre>
<p>As before, we replace each <code>C</code> with an equivalent expression:</p>
<pre><code>   A        B
—————— = ——————
sin(<em>a</em>)   sin(<em>b</em>)</code></pre>
<p>This is the same as we got before.<br />
We know the definition of <code>sine</code> is <code>opposite / hypotenuse</code>, so we can calculate the <code>sine</code> of the right angle (90°):</p>
<pre><code>           opposite    C
sin(<em>c</em>) =  —————————— = —
          hypotenuse   C</code></pre>
<div class="c1">This is perfectly valid, the side opposite the angle is the hypotenuse and the hypotenuse is still the hypotenuse. You can double check that <code>sin(90°) = 1</code>.</div>
<p>Rearranging to express it in terms of <code>C</code> we get:</p>
<pre><code>      C
C = ——————
    sin(<em>c</em>)</code></pre>
<p>Just as for the acute and obtuse triangle, we now have 3 expressions that are equivalent to <code>C</code> (for the previous triangles, it was <code>x</code> &#8211; the letter doesn&#8217;t matter, only the fact they are equal matters):<br />
Since all the relations are equivalent, we write the down together and get the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Law of Sines</span>:</p>
<pre><code>  A        B        C
—————— = —————— = ——————
sin(<em>a</em>)   sin(<em>b</em>)   sin(<em>c</em>)</code></pre>
<p>The post <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/mathematics/proving-the-law-of-sines/">Proving the Law of Sines</a> appeared first on <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com">Complete, Concrete, Concise</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
