 
    
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>printer Archives - Complete, Concrete, Concise</title>
	<atom:link href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/tag/printer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/tag/printer/</link>
	<description>Practical Information Without The Bloat</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 22:10:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Brother HL-3140CW Laser Printer &#8211; a Review</title>
		<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/brother-hl-3140cw-laser-printer-a-review/</link>
					<comments>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/brother-hl-3140cw-laser-printer-a-review/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richardsplanet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 22:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brother]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hl-3140cw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://complete-concrete-concise.com/?p=3066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>What I think after about one month of using the Brother HL-3140CW laser printer. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/brother-hl-3140cw-laser-printer-a-review/">Brother HL-3140CW Laser Printer &#8211; a Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com">Complete, Concrete, Concise</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="c1">
<p>This review is written after about one month of using the Brother HL-3140CW laser printer.</p>
<p>This is the third laser printer (second colour one) I&#8217;ve owned in the past 15 or 16 years (along with a number of inkjet printers and dot matrix printers before that).</p>
</div>
<h1>Summary</h1>
<p>The Brother HL-3140CW is a very fast printer with excellent print quality. I am very pleased with it and easily recommend it.</p>
<h1>Print Speed</h1>
<p>The printer is specified as printing 18 pages per minute in both colour and black and white. It is definitely very close to its advertised print speed.</p>
<p>If you are printing a lot of single page documents, then the print speed will be slower, but if you are printing a long document, the speed comes very close to 18 pages per minute.</p>
<p>Printing a 54 page (27 sheets double sided) document takes under 5 minutes and this includes the time needed to feed the paper back into the printer and hit continue.</p>
<h1>Print Quality</h1>
<p>The print quality is excellent. Text is nice and crisp and images are very nice.</p>
<p>Because this is a laser printer, image quality will not be as good as an inkjet on photographic paper, but it is still more than suitable if you were publishing a newsletter or zine with pictures in it. The image quality is far superior than an inkjet on plain paper (and there is no paper wrinkling or curling).</p>
<p><p>Below are three print samples (scanned at 1200 dpi) printed at (1) 600 dpi, (2) 2400 dpi and (3) 600 dpi with toner saver mode on (the font used is Calibri @ 11pt):</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/3140-text-sample.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered"/></p>
<p>There is no obvious difference between 600 and 2400 dpi mode for text. In toner saving mode, the printout is a little lighter, but not significantly so and is perfectly acceptable and readable for normal documents.</p>
<div class="c1">
<p><strong>Note:</strong> the image samples I&#8217;m showing look worse than the actual print, but illustrate (to some degree) how the print looks. Clearly, there is loss of fidelity in the scanning process (they came out a little blander) and in being scaled down.</p>
</div>
<div class="c2">
<p><strong>Original image:</strong></p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/flower-orig.jpg" width="480" height="364" alt="" border="0" class="centered"/></div>
<div class="c2">
<p><strong>Image printed at 600 dpi:</strong></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/flower-600.jpg" width="480" height="365" alt="" border="0" class="centered"/></p>
<p>Clearly this is not as vibrant as the original image, but it still looks remarkably good. The actual prints looks better than this scanned and resized version, but it still won&#8217;t pass for a photograph.</p></div>
<div class="c2">
<p><strong>Image printed at 2400 dpi:</strong></p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/flower-2400.jpg" width="480" height="365" alt="" border="0" class="centered"/></p>
<p>The main differences between printing at 2400 dpi and 600 dpi is that (1) at 2400 dpi, the image is lighter, whereas, at 600 dpi, the image shows better contrast and (2) at 2400 dpi, the image shows more fine detail that is lost at 600 dpi. In general, I don&#8217;t see much point in printing at 2400 dpi because the text quality doesn&#8217;t change and the more &#8220;washed&#8221; out image is less pleasing than that at 600 dpi.</p>
</div>
<p>The Brother HL-3140CW combines the print drum with the toner cartridge (when you change the toner, you only replace the toner portion of the combined unit &#8211; you can read instructions on doing this <a href="//complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/replacing-the-toner-cartridge-in-a-brother-hl-3140cw-printer">here</a>), so the actual drum unit is quite small &#8211; about 3cm in diameter. This gives the drum a circumference (length) of about 9.5cm, which means that there is the possibility of a horizontal printing artefact appearing about every 9.5cm:<br />
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/artifact.jpg" width="480" height="123" alt="" border="0" class="centered"/></p>
<p>If you look very carefully, you can see the artefact running through the middle of the print sample above. To be honest, it is not very noticeable unless (1) you are looking for it and (2) you know where to look. I have not noticed it in any text documents.</p>
<p>Below are 100% crops taken from the same place (more or less) on the original and printed copies. The printed images were scanned in at 600 dpi:</p>
<div class="c2"><strong></p>
<p>Original image:</p>
<p></strong><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/flower-crop-orig.jpg" width="480" height="360" alt="" border="0" class="centered"/></div>
<div class="c2"><strong></p>
<p>Image printed at 600 dpi:</p>
<p></strong><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/flower-crop-600.jpg" width="480" height="360" alt="" border="0" class="centered"/></div>
<div class="c2"><strong></p>
<p>Image printed at 2400 dpi:</p>
<p></strong><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/flower-crop-2400.jpg" width="480" height="360" alt="" border="0" class="centered"/></div>
<p>Once again, I point out that the scanned images look worse than the actual images in your hand.</p>
<h1>Wireless Setup</h1>
<p>If you have a one-touch wireless router, then setup should be as easy as pressing a button. Unfortunately, my router is not one of the one-touch types, so I had to connect the printer to my computer to set it up for wireless operation. I don&#8217;t remember the details of it, but I believe the instructions were simple enough and straightforward enough that I had no problem.</p>
<p>You will require a USB cable to connect the printer to your computer. This is not provided with the printer. The USB cable needs a regular USB connector on one end and a square connector on the other (also known as <code>Type A</code> and <code>Type B</code>):</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/usb-cable.jpg" width="480" height="395" alt="" border="0" class="centered"/></p>
<h1>Problems</h1>
<p>I haven&#8217;t had any problems with the printer aside from two paper jams.</p>
<p>The paper jams occurred when I was doing some double sided printing. To call it a paper jam seems harsh because all I needed to do to fix it was (1) pull the paper tray out, (2) flip through the paper, (3) reinsert the tray and continue printing.</p>
<p>I suspect the paper jam occurred because I hadn&#8217;t properly flipped through the pages before putting them back for printing on the other side.</p>
<h1>Toner Yield</h1>
<p>The toner cartridges are specified to yield 2500 pages (according to the ISO 19798 standard). Your yield will vary depending on how much content (toner used) you have per page. Clearly, printing double spaced text will result in more pages printed than if you are printing lots of full page images.</p>
<p>The printer comes with four starter cartridges (rated at 1000 pages). I finished my black toner after about 900 pages (mind you, I tend to print more content per page than the ISO test pages &#8211; and I did print out quite a few images), so this was not surprising.</p>
<div class="c1">
<p>If you are curious, you can see thumbnail samples of the five ISO 19798 test pages <a href="http://www.lexmark.com/es_XL/cartridges-ink-supplies/iso-page-yields/index.shtml">here</a> (<strong>note:</strong> this is an external link).</p>
<p>If you have some spare Swiss Francs, you can order your own copy of the document <a href="http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=50015">here</a> (<strong>note:</strong> this is an external link).</p>
</div>
<h1>Conclusion</h1>
<p>A great printer with excellent quality output that I am very happy with and highly recommend.</p>
<p>The wireless option is awesome, because now people can print directly from their own computer without having to go through mine first.</p>

<p>The post <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/brother-hl-3140cw-laser-printer-a-review/">Brother HL-3140CW Laser Printer &#8211; a Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com">Complete, Concrete, Concise</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/brother-hl-3140cw-laser-printer-a-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Epson SX130 &#8211; a Review</title>
		<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/epson-sx130-a-review/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richardsplanet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expensive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scanner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sx130]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t1281]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t1282]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t1283]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t1284]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t1291]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t1292]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t1293]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t1294]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://complete-concrete-concise.com/?p=1609</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>After my laser printer died, I was in a scramble to buy a replacement printer so my daughter could get some homework printed out. It was 7 years since my last printer purchase, so I wasn&#8217;t up to date on printers and didn&#8217;t have time to thoroughly research the market. I have owned ink jet [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/epson-sx130-a-review/">Epson SX130 &#8211; a Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com">Complete, Concrete, Concise</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="c1">
<p>After my laser printer died, I was in a scramble to buy a replacement printer so my daughter could get some homework printed out.</p>
<p>It was 7 years since my last printer purchase, so I wasn&#8217;t up to date on printers and didn&#8217;t have time to thoroughly research the market.</p>
<p><p>I have owned ink jet printers before, but have always preferred laser printers because (1) they are faster and (2) the cost of consumables is cheaper.</p>
<p>I bought the Epson SX130 because it was at a very attractive price and would meet my needs until I found a replacement laser printer.</p>
</div>
<h1>Summary</h1>
<p>The Epson SX130 is a low cost, ink jet printer and scanner combo that produces excellent quality prints and scans. Its cons are very slow print speed and high cost of operation.</p>
<h1>Print Speed</h1>
<p>The box says 30 pages per minute. That is not an exaggeration, it is an outright, boldfaced lie. The printer comes <u>nowhere</u> near 30 pages per minutes. Not even half that.</p>
<p>I get about 2 pages per minute printing black and white text on an A4 sheet (slightly narrower and longer than an 8&frac12;&#8221; x 11&#8243; sheet). Even in &#8220;fast&#8221; mode the print speed is not noticeably faster.</p>
<p>Printing out a 10cmx15cm (4&#8243;x6&#8243;) photograph takes over 2 minutes.</p>
<div class="c2">
<p><strong>Note:</strong> printing is significantly faster in &#8220;Draft&#8221; mode &#8211; maybe 6-10 pages per minute, but the print quality is quite poor &#8211; pretty much anything that isn&#8217;t solid black on white will be unreadable.</p>
</div>
<h1>Print Quality</h1>
<p>The print quality is excellent, both text and photos / images.</p>
<p>There is a &#8220;fast&#8221; print mode, but I don&#8217;t see any noticeable difference in print speed. But there is a difference in print quality &#8211; images get banding, and text can sometimes be skewed. So I leave the print quality in normal mode.</p>
<p><p>Below, you can see a closeup (scanned at 1200 dpi) sample of print quality:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/epson-sx130-print-comparison.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered" /></p>
<p>The top was from my laser printer, the middle using normal print mode on the Epson and the bottom using &#8220;fast&#8221; print mode on the Epson (I know, the fonts are different, sorry, but it doesn&#8217;t affect the whole point about quality).</p>
<p> The laser clearly gives the crispest print quality (it was a 600 dpi printer). The only difference I see between the normal print mode and fast print mode is that the letters are slightly coarser in fast print mode &#8211; but nothing to get excited over. The Epson gives very good quality text that, for normal reading, is indistinguishable from laser printer output.</p>
<p>Photographic prints (using photo paper) are excellent and I don&#8217;t see any appreciable difference from the prints I get from the photo shop. The images are sharp (assuming your photo was sharp) and the colours vibrant. I did not notice any banding.</p>
<div class="c2">
<p>Draft mode print quality is pretty much useless unless you have black on white text &#8211; even then, I think poring over a large number of draft mode pages will give one eye strain.</p>
<p>Below is a sample printed in draft mode (click for full-sized version):</p>
<p><a href="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/epson-sx130-draft-print-sample-big2.png" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/epson-sx130-draft-print-sample-thumb.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered" /></a></p>
<p>It is very faded and looks like the printer is running out of ink.</p>
</div>
<h1>Expensive to Print</h1>
<p>The Epson SX130 uses the T1281, T1282, T1283, T1284 printer cartridges &#8211; one cartridge for each colour. Epson touts this as being cheaper because you only need to change the empty cartridge. Maybe this is true, but probably not much.</p>
<p>Each cartridge hold 3ml of pigment based ink. That&#8217;s not a lot.</p>
<p>I get between twenty four and thirty 10cm x 15cm (4&#8243;x6&#8243;) photo prints (this assumes you are not printing pictures of predominantly one colour).</p>
<p>I get about 100 pages of black and white text</p>
<p>These yields are not very much (especially not compared to my laser printer where I was getting over 1000 pages per cartridge).</p>
<div class="c2">
<h3>Update 15-May-2012</h3>
<p>It is not possible to print if one of your ink cartridges are empty.</p>
<p>Epson claims this is to prevent possible damage to the empty catridge&#8217;s print head. When there is no ink, then only air gets sucked over the piezo element in the printhead. I suspect this could lead to overheating of the printhead and, consequently, failure.</p>
<p>Original source for this information comes <a href="http://www.stinkyinkshop.co.uk/blog/2011/09/16/why-wont-my-epson-printer-print-in-black-when-a-colour-cartridge-is-empty/">here</a>.</p>
</div>
<h3>Locked into Expensive Ink</h3>
<p>Epson sells identically sized cartridges called T1291, T1292, T1293, T1294. These are exactly the same size as the T128<em>x</em> cartridges, except that they contain 10ml of ink instead of 3ml of ink. They are used by many other Epson printers. The T128<em>x</em> are branded as <u>medium</u> yield cartridges and the T129<em>x</em> as <u>large</u> yield cartridges.</p>
<p>They <u>do not work</u> in the Epson SX130. Since you bought their cheapest printer, Epson is going to force you to buy their lowest yielding cartridges. This is not some sort of compatibility problem between the T129<em>x</em> cartridges and the SX130. It is  a <u>deliberate</u> decision by Epson to <u>lock out</u> use of those cartridges on the Epson SX130.</p>
<h3>Designed to Use More Ink</h3>
<p>In addition to forcing you to use the lowest yielding ink cartridges, Epson also selects print modes that encourage more use of ink (so you have to buy more expensive ink).</p>
<p>Since I mostly print text, I don&#8217;t care about colour. So I tick the <u>Grayscale</u> print option. I have to tick it every time I print &#8211; for some reason Epson doesn&#8217;t remember that setting. <span class="i1">Note: You can get the sx130 to remember your print settings. See this <a href="#update1">addendum</a> at the bottom of the article.</span> If <u>Grayscale</u> is not ticked, then the printer will use all the colours for printing (even if the text is only black and white) &#8211; thus slowly using up the other cartridges.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/epson-sx130-grayscale-not-default.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered" /></p>
<p>Not only that, but if you happen to be running low on black ink, it will ask you if you want to enable printing with the other colours:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/epson-sx130-low-ink.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered"/></p>
<p>I am sure Epson would argue that this is all to improve quality of the printing &#8211; which I am sure it does &#8211; but I am sure it doesn&#8217;t hurt that it also causes you to use more ink and, consequently, buy more of their expensive ink.</p>
<h1>Scanner</h1>
<p>I have had no problem with the scanner, it works fine. I used it to scan the text images above and I find the quality fine.</p>
<h1>Photo Copier</h1>
<p>The Epson SX130 can also act as a photocopier. Place your document on the scanner, press either the black and white or colour copy button and it will scan and print your document for you.</p>
<p>This is very nice feature and does not require the printer to be hooked up to the computer.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve used this feature several times and it is far easier than the old way I used to do it (which was to scan the document, fix it up in GIMP, and then print it out).</p>
<h1>Conclusion</h1>
<p>As an all-in-one printer / scanner / photocopier, the Epson SX130 is very easy to like.</p>
<p>It functions well and the output quality is excellent.</p>
<p>The use of pigment based inks means the photo quality and durability should be significantly better than those printed using dye based inks.</p>
<p>Where it fails, for me, is in the cost of consumables (the ink). Buying the set of four ink cartridges costs as much as the printer itself cost.</p>
<p>Epson deliberately locks out using the higher capacity T129<em>x</em> ink cartridges which should give you 3 times the yield for about 50% more cost (expressed another way, cost of ink would be about &frac12;).</p>
<p>This is not a printer for someone who needs to print things. This is a printer for someone who needs to print or copy something in a <u>pinch</u>. Maybe your main printer in out-of-order, or you don&#8217;t have time to go to the library to copy something, or the photo store is closed and you just got to get that picture printed and sent to aunt Mae.</p>
<p>This is not a suitable printer for students or anyone who needs to print &#8211; the cost of operation is prohibitive.</p>

<div class="c1">
<p><strong>NOTE:</strong> I have not yet tried 3<sup>rd</sup> party replacement ink cartridges. However, since my fiasco in purchasing a T1291 and not having it work, I am considering cheaper ink alternatives.</div>
<div class="c2"><a name="update1"></p>
<h1>UPDATE 15-May-2012</h1>
<p></a></p>
<p>It is possible to get the sx130 to remember your printer preferences if you want to print primarily in balck and white (or any other default printer settings you choose).</p>
<div class="c1">
<p>These instructions are for the sx130 printer driver running on Windows 7 with Service Pack 1.</p>
</div>
<p><strong>1) Click</strong> on Windows <u>Start</u> button:</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/epson-sx130-1.jpg" width="480" height="150" alt="" border="0" class="centered" /></p>
<p><strong>2) Click</strong> on <u>Devices and Printers</u>:</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/epson-sx130-2.jpg" width="480" height="258" alt="" border="0" class="centered" /></p>
<p><strong>3) Right-click</strong> on the printer and select <u>Printing Preferences</u> (click for full sized image):</p>
<p><a href="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/epson-sx130-3-big.png" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/epson-sx130-3-thumb.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered" /></a></p>
<p><strong>4) Configure</strong> the printing preferences you want and then <strong>click</strong> on <u>OK</u>:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/epson-sx130-4.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered" /></p>
<p>Next time you use the printer, it should use these default settings.</p>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/blog/epson-sx130-a-review/">Epson SX130 &#8211; a Review</a> appeared first on <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com">Complete, Concrete, Concise</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
