 
    
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>angles Archives - Complete, Concrete, Concise</title>
	<atom:link href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/tag/angles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/tag/angles/</link>
	<description>Practical Information Without The Bloat</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:27:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Understanding Supplementary and Complementary Angles</title>
		<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/mathematics/understanding-supplementary-and-complementary-angles/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richardsplanet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complementary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplementary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[understanding]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://complete-concrete-concise.com/?p=2753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Supplementary and complementary angles are useful concepts to understand in trigonometry. Supplementary angles are any two angles that sum (add) up to 180° (a straight line). An easy way to remember this is that Supplementary and Straight line both begin with the letter &#8216;S&#8217;. Complementary angles are any two angles that sum (add) up to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/mathematics/understanding-supplementary-and-complementary-angles/">Understanding Supplementary and Complementary Angles</a> appeared first on <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com">Complete, Concrete, Concise</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supplementary and complementary angles are useful concepts to understand in trigonometry.</p>
<p>Supplementary angles are any two angles that sum (add) up to 180° (a straight line).</p>
<div class="c1">
<p>An easy way to remember this is that <u>S</u>upplementary and <u>S</u>traight line both begin with the letter &#8216;S&#8217;.</p>
</div>
<p>Complementary angles are any two angles that sum (add) up to 90° (a corner).</p>
<div class="c1">
<p>An easy way to remember this is that <u>C</u>omplementary and <u>C</u>orner both begin with the letter &#8216;C&#8217;.</p>
</div>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/sup-compl-angles-1.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered"></p>
<p>In the above image, we see that angles <code>a</code> and <code>b</code> sum up to 90°, therefore they are complementary angles.</p>
<p>In the above image, we see that angles <code>c</code> and <code>d</code> sum up to 180°, therefore they are supplementary angles.</p>
<p>While the angles were drawn adjacent to one another, they don&#8217;t have to be &#8211; although, that is the most common way you will encounter them &#8211; any two angles that add up to 90° or 180° are complementary or supplementary angles.</p>
<h1>Why is this Useful?</h1>
<p>This is useful, because it helps in solving trigonometric problems.</p>
<p>For example, consider a construction in which A and B are supposed to be perpendicular. Unfortunately, you can&#8217;t measure the angle directly because there is a support beam that comes out from the corner. How can you determine if the walls are perpendicular?</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/sup-compl-angles-2.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered"></p>
<p>We know that walls (or beams or forces or whatever) are perpendicular if the angle between them is 90°</p>
<p>We can measure angle &alpha; and angle &beta; and if they are complimentary, then we know the walls are perpendicular.</p>
<div class="c1">
<p>This is a contrived example, but, in many proofs, recognizing complementary and supplementary angles is an important part of solving the problem.</p>
</div>
<div class="c2">
<p>For an example of using supplementary angles in proof, see the article <a href="//complete-concrete-concise.com/mathematics/proving-the-law-of-sines">Proving the Law of Sines</a> (the section on proving for obtuse triangles)</p>
</div>
<div class="c3">
<p>You can prove alternate interior angles are congruent using complementary angles.</p>
<div class="c1">
<p>Also see the article <a href="//complete-concrete-concise.com/mathematics/proving-alternate-interior-angles-are-congruent-the-same" class="">Proving Alternate Interior Angles are Congruent</a> for a long winded, but easy to understand proof that does not use complementary angles.</p>
</div>
<p>Using complementary angles, the proof can be made like this:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/sup-compl-angles-3.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered"></p>
<ul>
<li>Given two parallel lines and a transversal, draw a line perpendicular to the parallel lines passing through the intersection of the transversal and one of the parallel lines. This creates a right angle triangle.</li>
<li>Acute angles <code>a</code> and <code>b</code> are complementary.</li>
<li>The perpendicular line passing through the intersection of the transversal and one of the parallel lines forms a right angle which is bisected (divided) by the transversal. </li>
<li>Angles <code>a'</code> and <code>b</code> formed by this bisection are complementary, consequently, <code>a' = a</code></li>
</ul>
</div>

<p>The post <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/mathematics/understanding-supplementary-and-complementary-angles/">Understanding Supplementary and Complementary Angles</a> appeared first on <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com">Complete, Concrete, Concise</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proving Alternate Interior Angles are Congruent (the same)</title>
		<link>https://complete-concrete-concise.com/mathematics/proving-alternate-interior-angles-are-congruent-the-same/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richardsplanet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternate exterior angles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternate interior angles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prove]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://complete-concrete-concise.com/?p=1546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Alternate Interior Angles Theorem states that If two parallel straight lines are intersected by a third straight line (transversal), then the angles inside (between) the parallel lines, on opposite sides of the transversal are congruent (identical). This is illustrated in the image below: We see two parallel lines and a third line (transversal) intersecting [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/mathematics/proving-alternate-interior-angles-are-congruent-the-same/">Proving Alternate Interior Angles are Congruent (the same)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com">Complete, Concrete, Concise</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>Alternate Interior Angles Theorem</em> states that <u>If two parallel straight lines are intersected by a third straight line (transversal), then the angles inside (between) the parallel lines, on opposite sides of the transversal are congruent (identical)</u>.</p>
<p>This is illustrated in the image below:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/proving-alternate-interior-angles-0.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered" /></p>
<p>We see two parallel lines and a third line (transversal) intersecting (crossing or cutting through) both of them. The green shaded angles are: (1) inside (between) the two parallel lines, (2) congruent (identical or the same), and (3) on opposite sides of the transversal.</p>
<p>This is true for the other two unshaded interior angles. It is also true for the <em>alternate exterior angles</em> (but not proved here).</p>
<h1>Axioms</h1>
<p>Proofs are built on two things: (1) postulates, axioms, or hypotheses &#8211; these are things that are assumed to be true, but can&#8217;t be proved. In general, we try to use the fewest number of axioms we can; (2) other proofs.</p>
<p>This proof depends on two axioms: (1) if you pick any two distinct points on a straight line, the angle between those two points will be 180&deg;; (2) if you take any two intersecting straight lines and shift one of the lines so it it is in a different position, but still parallel to its original position, the angle between the two intersecting lines stays the same.</p>
<h1>Proof</h1>
<p><strong>1)</strong> Consider two intersecting lines:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/proving-alternate-interior-angles-1.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered" /></p>
<p>At the point of intersection, there is an angle (which I call <em>A</em>).</p>
<p><strong>2)</strong> If the line is straight, the angle between any two points on that line must be 180&deg; (axiom #1 from above):</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/proving-alternate-interior-angles-2.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered" /></p>
<p><strong>3)</strong> If one angle is <em>A</em> degrees, then obviously the other angle must be <em>180&deg; &#8211; A</em>:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/proving-alternate-interior-angles-3.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered" /></p>
<p><strong>4)</strong> This is true for both straight lines:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/proving-alternate-interior-angles-4.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered" /></p>
<p><strong>5)</strong> This means the remaining angle must be 180&deg; &#8211; (<em>180&deg; &#8211; A</em>) = A degrees:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/proving-alternate-interior-angles-5.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered" /></p>
<p>This proves that angles on alternate sides of the transversal (at the point of intersection) are congruent (identical).</p>
<p><strong>6)</strong> If we draw a line parallel to one of the lines (it doesn&#8217;t matter which) and it intersects the other line (that line is now called a <u>transversal</u>), we know that the angles of intersection must be the same (axiom #2 from above).</p>
<p>If the angles of intersection are the same for both lines, then the <em>alternate interior angles</em> must be the same:</p>
<p><img decoding="async" src="//complete-concrete-concise.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/proving-alternate-interior-angles-6.png" alt="" border="0" class="centered" /></p>
<div class="c1">
<p>The proof is exactly the same for <em>alternate exterior angles</em> except we focus on the exterior instead of the interior angles (which is illustrated in the image above).</p>
</div>

<p>The post <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com/mathematics/proving-alternate-interior-angles-are-congruent-the-same/">Proving Alternate Interior Angles are Congruent (the same)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://complete-concrete-concise.com">Complete, Concrete, Concise</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
